Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
"... merely to increase the reelection chances of one Senator."
Jon Chait, on the craven double-dealing of Harry Reid. Whatever one thinks of the climate change bill, it's quite disgraceful to see the sort of game being played here.
And consider this:
As for bad faith, Graham is a Republican Senator from South Carolina. His highest risk of losing his seat, by far, comes from the prospect of a conservative primary challenger. Indeed, I'd say that prospect is far from remote, and Graham is displaying an unusual willingness to risk his political future. He has little incentive to negotiate on these issues except that he believes it's the right thing to do. So when Democrats put climate change on the backburner to take up immigration, and so so for obviously political reasons, Graham has every right to be angry. He's risking his political life to address a vital issue, and Harry Reid is looking to save his seat.
Lindsey Graham has paid quite the political price in order to reach across the aisle, and work on a climate bill. If mere days before my hard work was to be unveiled, Harry Reid decided to set it aside for the purposes of political ass-covering, I'd be pissed too.
HT: TDD
dee-lighted
I don't care WHY climate change got back-burnered. It's cause for delight regardless of the circumstance.
Quick question, Brian. Is that delight due to climate change
being back-burnered in favor of immigration reform, or period? Just asking.
Both. But that's irrelevant
Both. But that's irrelevant with respect to your original post, with which I tend to agree. Any time you make yourself vulnerable to support a cause in which you believe, only to have others abandon you for their own expediency ... That sucks. But I guess that's politics.
Stupid politics...
It's stupid politics is what it is, Bobby. I mean, Reid perhaps considers his situation so desperate that he has no choice, but still pretty stupid, generally.
Republicans also need to understand that lesson. When we find Democrats willing to cross the aisle and help us, even though they do so for their own motivations and their own sense of what's right and wrong, we need to support them. THat doesn't mean give them the farm, but we need to not go out of our way to screw with them. If Joe Lieberman asks for support on some foreign policy and security legislation, we need to help him, so long as the legislation doesn't violate deep principles, because he's been there for us, and risked a lot with his own party, to vote with us on some seriously important issues. He's done so for his own reasons, but it would be stupid politics to gratuitously cross him.