StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Take Responsibility

Submitted by Simon on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 8:28am

Via Althouse:

NY Democratic Congressman Gary Ackerman leaned on Condoleezza Rice after she complained about the lack of Farsi and Arabic translators in the State Department: "It seems that the Defense Department has a 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' when it comes to homosexuals. You don't have such a prohibition in your agency, do you?" Ackerman asked Rice.

Congressman Ackerman is full of it. I never tire of pointing out that to call "Don't Ask Don't Tell" a "military policy" is laziness, mendacity or ignorance. It is no such thing; it's statutory law, duly enacted by Congress (a Democrat-controlled Congress, no less, and signed by President Clinton). See 10 U.S.C. § 654. Should the Department of Defense arbitrarily and unilaterally abrogate 10 U.S.C. § 654? If so, what other statutory provisions does Congressman Ackerman believe that the military can, or should, choose to ignore? (I might add that asking the military to disobey this law might well be construed to be inciting insurrection, for which see 18 U.S.C. § 2383 ("Whoever incites ... assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States").

Since they have a nice, shiny new majority, and since they clearly have such disdain for Don't Ask Don't Tell -- that is, if the Democrats think that banning gays from the military is such a terrible idea (and I express no opinion either way on that point) -- why doesn't the new Democratic majority repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell? Has Congressman Ackerman introduced a bill so to do? Why not?

Now that they're back in the majority, Democrats have no standing whatsoever to criticize Don't Ask Don't Tell, until they at least move a bill repealing it through Congress (even if it ultimately gets vetoed). This isn't a military policy. It's Congress' policy. And guess what, Democrats? That means it's now your policy. Take that back to 'Frisco on your private jet, Nancy.

Post facto:
First act of new Clinton Administration: Reverse first act of old Clinton Administration (4/7/08)
Don't Ask, Don't Tell, again (2/1/10)

Seems to me that they could do exactly that.

Whatever one's opinion, it is certainly true that Congress has set this policy. So, Ackerman needs to look in the mirror, and at his colleagues, and not lay undue blame on Condi Rice.

I'm just saying.

"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."

John 16:33

Especially when, of the

Especially when, of the three bills that the Library of Congress says Congressman Ackerman has introduced thusfar in this Congress (H.RES.107, Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Israeli soldiers held captive by Hamas and Hezbollah, and for other purposes; H.R.661, To amend the Humane Methods of Livestock Slaughter Act of 1958 to ensure the humane slaughter of nonambulatory livestock, and for other purposes; H.R.873, To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit fees by creditors for payments on credit card accounts by electronic fund transfers, and for other purposes), not a single one would repeal ? 654.

nit-picking

It's not a "policy," it's the law....

Policies are administrative, not statutory. No?

In any case, sounds to me like some of those folks are playing the gay card to duck out on their enlistments.

Technically, I think

Technically, I think regulation is the administrative law term - but even if not, I'm willing to beg some creative license to give this some extra punch. ;)

If Congress passed it, it's a law

If Congress passed it, it's a law.

If it was formally promulgated by an executive branch agency in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, it's a regulation or rule.

But policy is a more general term...

"Policy choices" are the substantive decisions made by those with authority to make binding pronouncements. Congress generally embodies its policies in law, while executive branch agencies embody their policies in regulations.

But "policy" itself is

But "policy" itself is simply a position, whether or not placed into statute or regulation for enforcement. Many policies do not become either statutory or regulatory. DADT is statutory law, implemented by administrative regulation.

Just sayin'.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 4 guests online.