Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
Why is it that Charlie Rangel loves the draft so much? Before 2004, he introduced a bill to reinstate the draft, trying to claim that he was only doing what President Bush would do after the election. That had no basis in anything resembling fact, and his bill went nowhere, but at least I understood the political impetus behind a Democrat claiming the President had a double-secret plan to draft poor people for "his" war.
But what explains Rep. Rangel's ongoing efforts to reinstate the draft? He says it's to deter future politicians from going to war:
"There's no question in my mind that this president and this administration would never have invaded Iraq, especially on the flimsy evidence that was presented to the Congress, if indeed we had a draft and members of Congress and the administration thought that their kids from their communities would be placed in harm's way."
Of course, having the draft didn't stop the U.S. from going to war in Korea and Vietnam. And Rep. Rangel and other Democrats (and Republicans, depending on who's in office) routinely savage the children of the privileged for finding ways to "avoid" the draft. If he's convinced of that fact, why does he think his draft will result in more of the privileged class serving? Does he believe he can close the "loopholes" like college deferment? In this vein, note that Rep. Rangel's efforts before the 2004 election had wide support in the "peace movement" and the Congressional Black Caucus.
For that matter, does he have any evidence to support his Michael Moore-esque allegation that children of Congress and the administration serve at lower rates than the rest of the country? I recall, but cannot find right now, in the aftermath of Farenheit 9/11 research showed that children and close relatives of Congress served at a higher-than-expected rate compared to the general public.
Perhaps he's intent on making John Kerry's delusional opinion about the quality of our troops come true, and he wants more drug addicts, drop-outs, and other idiots in the Army. Maybe he thinks an ignorant, doped-up Army will be too incompetent to fight any wars.
Or maybe he just wants to help folks get out of Mississippi.
P.S. For the record, we have plenty of high-quality troops.
UPDATE: Welcome, Michelle Malkin readers! Please visit a bit and check us out. In particular, be sure to read my co-blogger Bobby's post on Henry Kissinger and the war in Iraq. Bobby is stationed in Iraq now, and he knows more than most about what's really going on.
P.P.S. The original Charlie Rangel picture I used for the Photoshop above shows how obsessed the gentleman from New York is with the draft, I think. He chose to put this picture on his official Congressional biography page:
