Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
Now I'm sure we're all aware of the latest bit of controversy between Obama and McCain, over comments Obama made about the GOP and race. For a refresher, Obama said this:
"What they're going to try to do is make you scared of me," Obama said. "You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."
McCain took offense, and responded:
"I'm disappointed that Senator Obama would say the things he's saying," McCain told reporters in Racine, Wis. The Arizona senator said he agreed with campaign manager Rick Davis' statement earlier that "Barack Obama has played the race card, and he played it from the bottom of the deck. It's divisive, negative, shameful and wrong."
Obama's camp defended themselves this way:
"Barack Obama in no way believes that the McCain campaign is using race as an issue, but he does believe they're using the same old low-road politics to distract voters from the real issues in this campaign," said spokesman Bill Burton.
Let me say that I think Obama did make a mistake here, as McCain himself hasn't really brought up the issue of race, although Obama himself has, albeit in a different context. To be fair, Obama argued that the GOP would use race as an issue (and let's be clear, there's no other way to really interpret that "doesn't look like other Presidents" line), not that they did, although it's not really fair to make such a prediction without prior evidence. As to patriotism and attendant issues, Obama's on safer ground, at least with regards to the anti-Obama forces in general (less so with McCain specifically).
At the end of the day, on this issue, Obama played the race card.
Changing gears for a bit, there's been much talk about the campaign turning negative. It's a little disheartening, but not at all surprising, as I suspected for a while now that the idea of the candidates not going negative was a fairy tale. McCain has clearly decided to go negative, and if you ask me, it's personal now, as reflected by this now infamous ad, and this new one just put out.
First off, I'm not at all offended by these, but they are negative, decidedly personal, and ridiculous. The Spears-Hilton ad makes McCain look desperate. Some have suggested that there are racist overtones, but I don't see that at all. Rather, it's McCain basically saying Obama is an empty, vacuous celebrity with nothing to offer, like Britney and Paris. There are ways of making the argument I think McCain's trying to make, without taking it to that level. It makes him look silly, and frankly, a little petty.
But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
UPDATE: This doesn't really justify the ad, but to be fair, Obama apparently did bring it up first. HT: Althouse
The ad would have been less
The ad would have been less silly if everything was kept the same but McCain left out the images of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, which ended up distracting from the point.
I don't think it was meant to compare him to those two; it was meant to be a counter and to dismiss the importance of his European trip and reception in Berlin---saying that was about celebrity---while that doesn't change there are important issues Obama is on the wrong side of---like taxes and drilling.
In fact, thats why Obama was wrong when he characterized the ad by saying that Republicans don't want to address the issues, they just want to attack him. The ad was actually trying to say that the issues were what was important, not Obama's trip. The ad brought up a few issues.
Someone I talked to suggested the ad might have even worked if instead of Britney and Paris, it showed male celebrities like George Clooney and Alec Baldwin, who support Obama and are also active on political issues. Then, it would also be asking the question: Obama speaks well, but does that really mean he'd be a better president than George Clooney? While bringing attention to the fact that Obama's campaign looks as if its been produced by Hollywood.
I think the ad worked quite well...
I think the ad, while deemed inappropriate or silly or whatever by pundits, actually worked quite well with average folks. It got ATTENTION. If it had had George Clooney or somebody like that, then few people would have paid much attention. It only worked because the 2 celebrities chosen are entirely acknowledged as being utterly vapid. Clooney and others may be politically stupid (in my opinion), but they're not vapid and empty.
The purpose of a political ad is to move voters, not Hollywood or the pundit class. Comparing the obsession some of his supporters have with Obama with the obsession some folks have for the antics of Brittany and Paris clearly struck a nerve with some of the electorate, and may have made a few folks engage in some uncomfortable introspection for at least a few minutes.
More importantly, perhaps, the ad demonstrated that McCain is willing to play a little hard ball. Many on the conservative side are concerned that he is too cozy with Democrats to actually fight back. This ad sent a clear message he is ready to play politics and be a little gritty in order to win.
In sum, I think the ad hit just the right note needed, with perfect timing, to deflate the Obama in Europe bubble. And the polls around that time back me up...
Now that's actually a good point, Pat.
Many on the conservative side are concerned that he is too cozy with Democrats to actually fight back. This ad sent a clear message he is ready to play politics and be a little gritty in order to win.
Yeah, I do actually see that happening. I always suspected this would get ugly rather quickly, although as silly as the ad was, it's pretty tame compared to what we could see down the road. There is certainly an argument at work in the ad, and it's at the very least debatable, but I think there's a better way of laying that out (not that I agree with it, mind you). I guess the ad does work on those who've already decided that Obama is as vapid as Britney and Paris, but I still think many non-pundits will look at this and point out who silly looks.
"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."
John 16:33
Turns out that Obama's not opposed to using Paris as fodder...
It turns out that Sen. Obama is not opposed to using Paris Hilton as political fodder. From a Senate floor debate 2 years ago:
which low blows are OK?
Isn't it fun to see the partisans spin the debate over which low blows are too low?
The McCain camp invited folks to make the easy connection that Obama is as vapid as Paris Hilton, and then righteously cried foul that Obama "played the race card." Whatever that means. I guess it's a good thing for Obama that his claim is demonstrably true.
The one-term senator has big ears. Oh, and by the way, he's black. Apparently this was a secret to some folks. And apparently it's rude to mention it.
So according to GOP partisans, Obama was out of bounds, but McCain's porridge was just right. So I guess that instead of playing cards, Obama should have countered with a commercial pointing out that people with experience often lack judgement and make mistakes. And then, as examples, it would have been OK to use a couple of ancient and addled guys. Like maybe Perot's old running mate or someone with Alzheimers. And that would have been OK. Let's get working on that list of famous old idiots!
Or maybe they could have gone with a few "long-time insiders" and linked McCain to Ted Stevens. And that would have been OK. But saying you look different? That's out of bounds. My silly meter is off chart.
__________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole
Good questions but...
It does go beyond "republican" perceptions as the latest Rasmussen poll points out. Fair, I don't know. But it does suggest that Sen. Obama is still working out how to appeal to independents.
Chris