StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

"when anything goes, the first thing to go is apostolic tradition."

Submitted by Simon on Thu, 08/26/2010 - 10:24am

In an interesting piece titled When compromise trumps apostolic tradition, George Weigel notes:

… in the Church of England’s debate over the ordination of women as bishops[, the Archbishops of Canterbury and York] … proposed a compromise in which the Church of England would ordain women to its episcopate, but parishes unable to accept this innovation would be allowed to invite a male bishop to preside over those rituals for which a bishop’s presence is required. This compromise was rejected by the General Synod of the Church of England….

While the synod doubtless thought that it was whipping a few troglodyte parishes into line, its action looks to me more like a declaration of the synod's irrelevance in resolving the issue. The concerns that prompted Williams and Sentamu—he of the comical chasuble and mitre—to offer a compromise, one which surely ran against their own views, arise from literally millennia of apostolic tradition. Since most people who don't care about apostolic tradition left the Church of England (if not Christianity as a whole) a long time ago, the concerns of those left for it are unlikely to evaporate just because a thoroughly modernist general synod looks down its nose at them. (Cf. the remarks of Canon Celia Thompson1 reported here.) Those "parishes unable to accept this innovation" can, and may, resolve the issue by seizing the other "compromise" available to them: Anglicanorum Coetibus.

I'm told that the Tiber is comfortably warm in this season!

This via Fr. Finigan, who also links to a splendid documentary on Vatican City and the Pope's "normal" day. Who knew that there is an all-Vatican football tournament?!

  1. 1. A canon is, roughly-speaking, the CoE equivalent of a Monsignor.

Churches often try to defend

Churches often try to defend this tradition through a theological perspective, but I think a lot can be said for it from a secular perspective. There is no reason whatsoever that religion has to mirror secular society. Religion is largely about symbolism and ritual, for instance, it celebrates the passages of life -- birth, rites of passage, weddings, death. These occasions are marked with ceremonies. Another thing that's important in religion is to have a discussion of gender, not necessarily as a restrictive thing, as something that limits us, but as a force that shapes our lives nonetheless. Its up to the religions how they want to move forward, and how much they think they can change. But the discussion on that, imo, needs to start by recognizing its not a contradiction at all to have an equal opportunity society in the secular sphere, and have different roles in the religious sphere.

Right, and even in the

Right, and even in the Church, one has to remember that the Church maintains two positions that are seen as contradictory by some, but which are not at all so: that women are equal to men yet only men are called to the ministerial priesthood. Compare P. Con. Gaudium et Spes, no. 29 (2d Vat. Council, 1965) with Ap. L. Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (John Paul II, 1994). That isn't a contradiction. As I explained in my recent essay on clericalism (a similar treatment of women's ordination is in the works), there is a oneness of mission but a diversity of ministry . Accord Apostolicam Actuositatem, no. 2 (2d Vat. Council, 1965); Christifideles Laici, no. 20 (John Paul II, 1988).

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.